UBE Question of the Day

Bar Exam Multiple Choice Questions


Subscribe to Pieper's Uniform Bar Exam Question of the Day and receive a real MBE multiple choice question right in your inbox every weekday morning.

Pieper Bar Review continues to make studying for the bar exam easier, not only by providing the best bar review course, but by now offering access to sample bar exam multiple choice question.

As a law student, you are focused on the task at hand, passing the bar. This free subscription will help you:

  • Review recurrent themes that show up on the UBE
  • Familiarize yourself with question format and wording
  • Practice process-of-elimination skills
  • Stay focused on your studies with a daily reminder
  • Reiterate the material covered in your bar review course

Get the Question of the Day Delivered Every Morning

Sign up to receive a new multiple choice bar exam question in your inbox every day.

Today's Question:

Question Of The Day

A homeowner and a decorator contracted in a signed writing to remodel the homeowner’s kitchen for $5,000. Before the writing was signed, the parties orally agreed that the contract would be void if the owner did not obtain a $5,000 bank loan within thirty days. Despite a good-faith effort, the homeowner could not obtain a loan. Just before the thirty days elapsed, the homeowner told the contractor that the agreement was off and that work should not commence. If the decorator sues the homeowner for breach of contract, can the homeowner assert her inability to obtain a loan as a defense?

(A) Yes, because obtaining a loan was a condition precedent to the existence of an enforceable contract.

(B) Yes, because the agreement about obtaining a loan is a modification of a construction contract and is not required to be in writing.

(C) No, because the agreement about obtaining a loan contradicts the express and implied terms of the writing.

(D) No, because the homeowner is estopped from denying the validity of the written agreement.